Student's Arrest for Op-Ed Sparks Outrage

In a striking turn of events, a federal judge has mandated the release of Rümeysa Öztürk, a Tufts University PhD student who was detained by the Trump administration apparently for authoring an op-ed. The case has sparked significant public outcry and legal scrutiny, highlighting the administration’s aggressive stance on visa revocations for students involved in political activism.

On May 6, 2025, supporters rallied in New York City for Öztürk and Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University student activist, both of whom have now been ordered freed. This story was initially covered in The Logoff, a daily newsletter aimed at keeping readers informed about the Trump administration without overwhelming them with political news.

Öztürk, a Turkish national, was taken into custody by ICE agents in late March as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to revoke visas from students who protested Israel’s war in Gaza. What made her arrest particularly jarring was the lack of evidence suggesting she had participated in any disruptive or illegal protests. Instead, her detention seemed to stem from an op-ed she co-authored in Tufts’ student newspaper, which criticized the war and called on school administrators to address students’ concerns.

A Trump administration spokesperson anonymously asserted in March that ‘DHS and ICE investigations found Öztürk engaged in activities in support of Hamas.’ However, this claim has yet to be substantiated with any concrete evidence, even when Öztürk filed a lawsuit challenging her detention.

Judge William Sessions III ordered Öztürk’s immediate release, expressing his dismay over the administration’s actions. He stated that the government’s conduct ‘chills the speech of the millions and millions of people who are not citizens.’ The judge noted that Öztürk had presented ‘very substantial claims of First Amendment and due process violations’ and that the government had provided no evidence to support their motives for detaining her beyond the op-ed.

While Öztürk has been released from detention, the legal battle is far from over. The question of whether the U.S. government can legally revoke her visa remains unresolved. Judge Sessions’ ruling suggests he is likely to rule in her favor, but the outcome could be different if the case reaches the Supreme Court, given its conservative leanings. This case has been a significant embarrassment for the Trump administration, and there is a glimmer of hope that they might choose to drop it.

In an unrelated note, for those interested in thought-provoking cinema, Jia Zhangke, one of the most acclaimed directors of our time, recently shared his favorite films on the Criterion Closet. His own films, which offer a unique blend of contemplative storytelling and unexpected musical interludes, are also available for streaming on the Criterion Channel.

This case underscores the importance of protecting free speech and due process, especially for non-citizens. The Trump administration’s actions in this instance appear to be a blatant attempt to suppress dissent and intimidate students into silence. It is crucial that the judicial system continues to uphold the principles of freedom of expression and fair treatment under the law, regardless of one’s immigration status. The public must remain vigilant and advocate for these rights to ensure that such abuses of power do not go unchallenged.